Body of Knowledge · Reference

Glossary & Further Reading

Every term defined, and the curated reading list behind the EMBoK.

Body of KnowledgeGlossary & Further Reading

Glossary & Further Reading

Glossary

Every term of art used in this document, defined as this document uses it. Terms marked with a domain reference are developed fully in that competency.

  • 30/60/90 — framing a new hire's first quarter as explicit 30-, 60-, and 90-day outcomes (1.3).
  • Affinity bias — favouring people similar to yourself in evaluation; a structured-interview target (1.3).
  • Aligned autonomy — direction and boundary standards set centrally, methods left to teams (2.5, 4.3).
  • Altitude — the organisational scope at which judgment is exercised: Associate (a team), Professional (across teams), Expert (an organisation).
  • Architecture review forum — standing cross-team scrutiny of significant designs; advisory and educational, not a universal gate (4.1).
  • Blameless post-mortem — incident review focused on how the system allowed the failure and what to change, rather than who to blame (2.3, 5.1).
  • Bottom-up roadmap — a department "strategy" assembled from team wish lists, lacking a connecting thesis (3.1).
  • Brilliant jerk — a high performer whose behaviour violates team values; tolerating one teaches that results buy exemption (1.4, 5.5).
  • Bus factor — the number of people who could leave before critical knowledge or capability is lost; see key-person risk (2.4, 4.2).
  • Calibration — aligning evaluation standards across interviewers, managers, or organisations so the same performance earns the same judgment (1.3, 1.4).
  • Change failure rate — the proportion of deployments causing failures in production; a DORA stability metric (3.5).
  • Charter — the explicit statement of what a team or department owns; charter disputes are settled at the level that sets them (3.4).
  • Coaching vs. directing — developing someone's judgment through questions versus supplying the answer; the default and the exception, respectively (5.2).
  • Commitment (vs. estimate) — what you promise externally, deliberately buffered, as distinct from your best forecast (2.2).
  • Cone of uncertainty — estimates are least accurate at a project's start and narrow as work is discovered (2.2).
  • Contract testing — automated verification of the agreement between a service and its consumers (2.4, 4.3).
  • Conway's Law — systems mirror the communication structures of the organisations that build them (4.1).
  • Core vs. context — build what differentiates the business; buy or adopt the commodity (3.4).
  • Cost of delay — value lost per unit time that work remains unshipped; the economic basis of sequencing (2.1).
  • Cycle time — how long work actually takes from start to done; the basis of historical forecasting (2.2).
  • DORA metrics — research-validated, team-level software-delivery measures: deployment frequency, change lead time, change failure rate, failed-deployment recovery time, rework rate (3.5).
  • Error budget — the tolerable shortfall against a service-level objective, treated as a spendable resource gating risk (2.3, 5.5).
  • Estimate range — a forecast expressed as a range with named assumptions, avoiding false precision (2.2).
  • Executive docket — the short list of technical decisions an executive personally owns rather than delegates (4.5).
  • Glue work — essential, under-recognised work that makes teams function: coordination, documentation, unblocking (5.3).
  • Goodhart's Law — when a measure becomes a target, it ceases to be a good measure (3.5).
  • Growth ladder / competency matrix — explicit level descriptions making career progression concrete and comparable (1.5).
  • Halo effect — one impressive trait colouring an entire evaluation (1.3).
  • Incident command — a single coordination-and-communication owner during an incident, freeing responders to fix (2.3).
  • Intrinsic motivation — lasting motivation from autonomy, mastery, and purpose rather than external reward (5.4).
  • Inverse Conway manoeuvre — designing the organisation to induce the architecture you want (4.1).
  • Key-person risk — critical capability or context concentrated in one person; a dependency to engineer away (1.1, 2.4).
  • Learning zone — the combination of high psychological safety and high standards (5.1).
  • Office housework — necessary low-visibility tasks (notes, scheduling, coverage) that fall inequitably unless managed (5.3).
  • One-way / two-way door — irreversible versus reversible decisions; deliberate on the former, move fast on the latter (2.4, 4.5).
  • Operating cadence — the organisation's rhythm of planning, review, and escalation (2.5).
  • Outcome (vs. output) — the change you want in the world, versus the thing you build (3.1).
  • Paved road — a well-supported default platform making the good path the easy path; teams may leave it at their own cost (4.3).
  • Portfolio governance — explicit ranking and limiting of concurrent initiatives at organisational scale (2.1).
  • Pre-mortem — assuming a plan has failed before starting and asking why; legitimised dissent (2.4).
  • Psychological safety — a shared belief that the environment is safe for interpersonal risk-taking (Edmondson; Project Aristotle) (5.1).
  • RACI — Responsible, Accountable, Consulted, Informed; a decision-ownership map (1.1, 2.4).
  • Rescuing — jumping in with the solution the moment someone struggles; the anti-pattern of coaching (5.2).
  • SBI (Situation–Behaviour–Impact) — feedback anchored in a specific situation, observable behaviour, and its impact (1.2).
  • Situational leadership — flexing style (directing → coaching → supporting → delegating) to competence and confidence on the task (1.1).
  • Skip-level 1:1 — a leader's regular 1:1 with their reports' reports; unfiltered signal, never a bypass (1.5).
  • SLO (service-level objective) — an explicit reliability target from which the error budget derives (2.3).
  • Span of control — how many direct reports a leader can effectively serve; a function of context, not a constant (1.1).
  • Structured interview — consistent questions mapped to a rubric, scored independently before discussion (1.3).
  • Sunk cost — what has already been spent; argues for nothing in forward-looking decisions (3.4).
  • Task-relevant maturity — how much direction someone needs on a specific kind of task, independent of seniority (Grove) (1.1).
  • Technical debt — the implied future cost of an expedient choice; deliberate-prudent debt is a trade, reckless debt is mess (4.2).
  • Technical-debt quadrant — Fowler's classification of debt as deliberate/inadvertent × prudent/reckless (4.2).
  • Total cost of ownership (TCO) — full lifetime cost of a capability: build plus maintenance, or price plus integration, lock-in, and exit (3.4).
  • Watermelon status — reporting that is green outside and red inside; a broken information system, not a broken team (2.4).
  • WIP limit — a cap on concurrent work so the most important things finish sooner (2.1).

Further reading

These works expand on the concepts in this document. They are recommended background, not exam prerequisites; the exams test judgment, not bibliography.

  • High Output Management — Andrew S. Grove (task-relevant maturity, managerial leverage)
  • The Manager's Path — Camille Fournier (the management career arc, level by level)
  • The Making of a Manager — Julie Zhuo (the first-line transition)
  • An Elegant Puzzle: Systems of Engineering Management — Will Larson (org design and systems thinking at scale)
  • Staff Engineer — Will Larson (the senior IC track leaders must understand)
  • The Staff Engineer's Path — Tanya Reilly (senior IC leadership; the source of "glue work")
  • Accelerate: The Science of Lean Software and DevOps — Forsgren, Humble & Kim (the DORA research)
  • Site Reliability Engineering — Beyer, Jones, Petoff & Murphy, eds. (SLOs, error budgets, blameless post-mortems)
  • Team Topologies — Matthew Skelton & Manuel Pais (Conway's Law in practice; the inverse Conway manoeuvre)
  • Good Strategy Bad Strategy — Richard Rumelt (diagnosis, guiding policy, coherent action)
  • The Mythical Man-Month — Frederick P. Brooks Jr. (why adding people to late work makes it later)
  • The Fearless Organization — Amy C. Edmondson (psychological safety)
  • Radical Candor — Kim Scott (feedback: care personally, challenge directly)
  • Drive — Daniel H. Pink (autonomy, mastery, purpose)
  • Resilient Management — Lara Hogan (coaching, sponsorship, and change)
  • Crucial Conversations — Patterson, Grenny, McMillan & Switzler (high-stakes conversations)

Engineering Management Body of Knowledge (EMBoK) v2.0 — aligned to the EMA Competency Framework v1.0. This document evolves with the framework; check the version noted on the framework page for the edition your exam assesses against.

Want the complete guide in one file?

Download PDF