Skip to content
Body of Knowledge · Reference · v2.0 archive

Glossary & Further Reading

Every term defined, and the curated reading list behind the EMBoK.

This is the archived v2.0 edition. It is kept unchanged for reference and is not the examined standard. Read the current edition: Glossary & Further Reading in v3.0 →
Body of KnowledgeGlossary & Further Reading

Glossary & Further Reading

Glossary

Every term of art used in this document, defined as this document uses it. Terms marked with a domain reference are developed fully in that competency.

  • 30/60/90 — framing a new hire's first quarter as explicit 30-, 60-, and 90-day outcomes (1.3).
  • Affinity bias — favouring people similar to yourself in evaluation; a structured-interview target (1.3).
  • Aligned autonomy — direction and boundary standards set centrally, methods left to teams (2.5, 4.3).
  • Altitude — the organisational scope at which judgment is exercised: Associate (a team), Professional (across teams), Expert (an organisation).
  • Architecture review forum — standing cross-team scrutiny of significant designs; advisory and educational, not a universal gate (4.1).
  • Blameless post-mortem — incident review focused on how the system allowed the failure and what to change, rather than who to blame (2.3, 5.1).
  • Bottom-up roadmap — a department "strategy" assembled from team wish lists, lacking a connecting thesis (3.1).
  • Brilliant jerk — a high performer whose behaviour violates team values; tolerating one teaches that results buy exemption (1.4, 5.5).
  • Bus factor — the number of people who could leave before critical knowledge or capability is lost; see key-person risk (2.4, 4.2).
  • Calibration — aligning evaluation standards across interviewers, managers, or organisations so the same performance earns the same judgment (1.3, 1.4).
  • Change failure rate — the proportion of deployments causing failures in production; a DORA stability metric (3.5).
  • Charter — the explicit statement of what a team or department owns; charter disputes are settled at the level that sets them (3.4).
  • Coaching vs. directing — developing someone's judgment through questions versus supplying the answer; the default and the exception, respectively (5.2).
  • Commitment (vs. estimate) — what you promise externally, deliberately buffered, as distinct from your best forecast (2.2).
  • Cone of uncertainty — estimates are least accurate at a project's start and narrow as work is discovered (2.2).
  • Contract testing — automated verification of the agreement between a service and its consumers (2.4, 4.3).
  • Conway's Law — systems mirror the communication structures of the organisations that build them (4.1).
  • Core vs. context — build what differentiates the business; buy or adopt the commodity (3.4).
  • Cost of delay — value lost per unit time that work remains unshipped; the economic basis of sequencing (2.1).
  • Cycle time — how long work actually takes from start to done; the basis of historical forecasting (2.2).
  • DORA metrics — research-validated, team-level software-delivery measures: deployment frequency, change lead time, change failure rate, failed-deployment recovery time, rework rate (3.5).
  • Error budget — the tolerable shortfall against a service-level objective, treated as a spendable resource gating risk (2.3, 5.5).
  • Estimate range — a forecast expressed as a range with named assumptions, avoiding false precision (2.2).
  • Executive docket — the short list of technical decisions an executive personally owns rather than delegates (4.5).
  • Glue work — essential, under-recognised work that makes teams function: coordination, documentation, unblocking (5.3).
  • Goodhart's Law — when a measure becomes a target, it ceases to be a good measure (3.5).
  • Growth ladder / competency matrix — explicit level descriptions making career progression concrete and comparable (1.5).
  • Halo effect — one impressive trait colouring an entire evaluation (1.3).
  • Incident command — a single coordination-and-communication owner during an incident, freeing responders to fix (2.3).
  • Intrinsic motivation — lasting motivation from autonomy, mastery, and purpose rather than external reward (5.4).
  • Inverse Conway manoeuvre — designing the organisation to induce the architecture you want (4.1).
  • Key-person risk — critical capability or context concentrated in one person; a dependency to engineer away (1.1, 2.4).
  • Learning zone — the combination of high psychological safety and high standards (5.1).
  • Office housework — necessary low-visibility tasks (notes, scheduling, coverage) that fall inequitably unless managed (5.3).
  • One-way / two-way door — irreversible versus reversible decisions; deliberate on the former, move fast on the latter (2.4, 4.5).
  • Operating cadence — the organisation's rhythm of planning, review, and escalation (2.5).
  • Outcome (vs. output) — the change you want in the world, versus the thing you build (3.1).
  • Paved road — a well-supported default platform making the good path the easy path; teams may leave it at their own cost (4.3).
  • Portfolio governance — explicit ranking and limiting of concurrent initiatives at organisational scale (2.1).
  • Pre-mortem — assuming a plan has failed before starting and asking why; legitimised dissent (2.4).
  • Psychological safety — a shared belief that the environment is safe for interpersonal risk-taking (Edmondson; Project Aristotle) (5.1).
  • RACI — Responsible, Accountable, Consulted, Informed; a decision-ownership map (1.1, 2.4).
  • Rescuing — jumping in with the solution the moment someone struggles; the anti-pattern of coaching (5.2).
  • SBI (Situation–Behaviour–Impact) — feedback anchored in a specific situation, observable behaviour, and its impact (1.2).
  • Situational leadership — flexing style (directing → coaching → supporting → delegating) to competence and confidence on the task (1.1).
  • Skip-level 1:1 — a leader's regular 1:1 with their reports' reports; unfiltered signal, never a bypass (1.5).
  • SLO (service-level objective) — an explicit reliability target from which the error budget derives (2.3).
  • Span of control — how many direct reports a leader can effectively serve; a function of context, not a constant (1.1).
  • Structured interview — consistent questions mapped to a rubric, scored independently before discussion (1.3).
  • Sunk cost — what has already been spent; argues for nothing in forward-looking decisions (3.4).
  • Task-relevant maturity — how much direction someone needs on a specific kind of task, independent of seniority (Grove) (1.1).
  • Technical debt — the implied future cost of an expedient choice; deliberate-prudent debt is a trade, reckless debt is mess (4.2).
  • Technical-debt quadrant — Fowler's classification of debt as deliberate/inadvertent × prudent/reckless (4.2).
  • Total cost of ownership (TCO) — full lifetime cost of a capability: build plus maintenance, or price plus integration, lock-in, and exit (3.4).
  • Watermelon status — reporting that is green outside and red inside; a broken information system, not a broken team (2.4).
  • WIP limit — a cap on concurrent work so the most important things finish sooner (2.1).

Further reading

These works expand on the concepts in this document. They are recommended background, not exam prerequisites; the exams test judgment, not bibliography.

  • High Output Management — Andrew S. Grove (task-relevant maturity, managerial leverage)
  • The Manager's Path — Camille Fournier (the management career arc, level by level)
  • The Making of a Manager — Julie Zhuo (the first-line transition)
  • An Elegant Puzzle: Systems of Engineering Management — Will Larson (org design and systems thinking at scale)
  • Staff Engineer — Will Larson (the senior IC track leaders must understand)
  • The Staff Engineer's Path — Tanya Reilly (senior IC leadership; the source of "glue work")
  • Accelerate: The Science of Lean Software and DevOps — Forsgren, Humble & Kim (the DORA research)
  • Site Reliability Engineering — Beyer, Jones, Petoff & Murphy, eds. (SLOs, error budgets, blameless post-mortems)
  • Team Topologies — Matthew Skelton & Manuel Pais (Conway's Law in practice; the inverse Conway manoeuvre)
  • Good Strategy Bad Strategy — Richard Rumelt (diagnosis, guiding policy, coherent action)
  • The Mythical Man-Month — Frederick P. Brooks Jr. (why adding people to late work makes it later)
  • The Fearless Organization — Amy C. Edmondson (psychological safety)
  • Radical Candor — Kim Scott (feedback: care personally, challenge directly)
  • Drive — Daniel H. Pink (autonomy, mastery, purpose)
  • Resilient Management — Lara Hogan (coaching, sponsorship, and change)
  • Crucial Conversations — Patterson, Grenny, McMillan & Switzler (high-stakes conversations)

Engineering Management Body of Knowledge (EMBoK) v2.0 — aligned to the EMA Competency Framework v1.0. This document evolves with the framework; check the version noted on the framework page for the edition your exam assesses against.

Want the complete guide in one file?

Download PDF