EMA-I Associate
1. Purpose and how to read this document
This document states what the EMA-I examination assesses and how. It is published so that a candidate can prepare against the actual standard and an employer can read exactly what the credential certifies. It is the authoritative description of the examination; where marketing copy and this document differ, this document is correct.
Read it in this order. The specification below gives the shape of the sitting. The per-competency sections then say, for each of the twenty-nine competencies in the EMA Competency Framework v3.0, how many questions it carries on this examination, what a certified Associate can do (the proficiency indicators), the kinds of situations questions present, the balance between applying a principle and analysing a situation, and which parts of the EMA Body of Knowledge the competency traces to. Two competencies carry no questions at this level and are listed under what the examination does not assess.
The indicators describe judgment at team scope: one team, direct reports,
the manager acting directly. Every indicator has the form "A certified
Associate can …" and carries the scope tag team, which is the same tag
the Body of Knowledge uses in its judgment sections. Questions are
scenario-based. They do not ask you to name a model or define a term; they
put you in a situation and ask for the most defensible action, and the
wrong options are built from recognisable mistakes rather than nonsense.
Preparation, in one paragraph: read the framework and the chapter How Judgment Scales, then the Body of Knowledge unit for each competency with a weight above zero here, giving most time to the highest-weighted ones and to each unit's Judgment and Tensions sections, which is where the questions come from. The Academy publishes no course and endorses none; the Body of Knowledge is free and is the whole of the examined material.
2. Exam specification
Question formats
- Single best answer. A situation and four options; exactly one is the most defensible action.
- Extended scenario. A longer situation stem, then a question with four options and one best answer. Some scenarios carry two or three questions on the same stem.
- Select all that apply. Two or more options are correct. Scored as one question, right only when the selection matches exactly.
- True or false. A statement about practice to be judged true or false. Used sparingly, for principles that must be held without qualification.
Scoring
Every question is worth one point. There is no partial credit and no negative marking; an unanswered question scores zero. The pass standard is 70% of all questions in the sitting — 42 of 60 — not of the questions answered. The clock is enforced by the examination server; answers saved after time expires are not counted. A sitting draws its questions from the EMA-I bank with an equal number from each of the five domains, in an order fixed for that sitting, so a resumed sitting shows the same questions.
From 2026-10-27, every EMA-I sitting started on or after that date draws its questions by the per-competency weights in this outline: each competency contributes the number of questions shown, and each domain keeps its 12 of 60. Sittings started before that date drew 12 questions per domain without a per-competency distribution.
3. The cumulative model
EMA-I is the base of the ladder. Every indicator below applies at team scope. EMP-II and EME-III inherit all of them and add their own.
People Leadership — 12 questions
PL-1Delegation, ownership, and decision rights
3 questionsProficiency indicators
- I1A certified Associate can delegate an outcome rather than a set of steps, stating the constraints and the level of authority that goes with it. team
- I2A certified Associate can match the scope of what they hand off to a person's demonstrated capability on that kind of work, with a deliberate stretch and a safety net. team
- I3A certified Associate can recognise the moment they are about to take delegated work back, and choose support over rescue. team
Scenario contexts at this level
- An engineer is struggling with a delegated project and the deadline is close.
- A senior engineer wants a decision made for them that is theirs to make.
- Two engineers are unclear who owns a piece of work and both have stopped.
PL-2Feedback and difficult conversations
3 questionsProficiency indicators
- I1A certified Associate can give corrective feedback anchored in a specific situation and observable behaviour, and name its impact, without diagnosing intent. team
- I2A certified Associate can hold a difficult conversation early rather than waiting for a review cycle or hoping the problem resolves. team
- I3A certified Associate can invite and act on feedback about their own management from the people they lead. team
Scenario contexts at this level
- A high performer's behaviour is quietly damaging the team and nobody has said so.
- An engineer reacts defensively to feedback and the manager must decide what to do next.
- The team gives the manager a hard piece of upward feedback in a retrospective.
PL-3Hiring and onboarding
2 questionsProficiency indicators
- I1A certified Associate can run a structured interview against criteria defined before the process starts, and recognise the biases that unstructured evaluation invites. team
- I2A certified Associate can assess what a candidate can do rather than which tools they were permitted, and distinguish capability from fluency. team
- I3A certified Associate can design a first ninety days that gives a new hire explicit outcomes, a named guide, and early feedback. team
Scenario contexts at this level
- A panel disagrees about a candidate after an interview loop with no rubric.
- A new hire is three weeks in and nobody can say whether they are doing well.
PL-4Performance management
2 questionsProficiency indicators
- I1A certified Associate can diagnose whether an engineer's underperformance is a matter of skill, will, or the conditions they were given, before choosing a response. team
- I2A certified Associate can set expectations explicitly enough that a later performance conversation refers to something the engineer already knew. team
- I3A certified Associate can follow a fair process to an honest consequence, including a formal one, without avoiding it or rushing it. team
Scenario contexts at this level
- An engineer has missed targets for two quarters and attributes it to unclear requirements that were, in fact, unclear.
- A well-liked engineer is not meeting the bar and the manager is tempted to wait for the next cycle.
PL-5Career development and growth paths
2 questionsProficiency indicators
- I1A certified Associate can run a one-on-one that belongs to the report — their growth, their concerns — rather than to the manager's status needs. team
- I2A certified Associate can respond to a promotion request with evidence, a named gap, and a path, rather than a yes to retain or a no without reasons. team
- I3A certified Associate can help an engineer weigh the senior individual-contributor track against management without steering them toward the manager's own path. team
Scenario contexts at this level
- A talented engineer asks for promotion before consistently showing the next level's judgment.
- A senior engineer is bored and the manager cannot offer a promotion this cycle.
PL-6Leading through leaders
not assessed at this levelSee What this exam does not assess below. Assessed from EMP-II.
Domain hub: People Leadership
Delivery & Execution — 12 questions
DE-1Prioritisation under constraint
3 questionsProficiency indicators
- I1A certified Associate can sequence a team's work by value and cost of delay rather than by who asked loudest or most recently. team
- I2A certified Associate can say no by surfacing the cost of yes — "we can do X, and Y slips" — and let the stakeholder choose. team
- I3A certified Associate can protect a team's focus against constant reprioritisation, and recognise when too much started work means nothing finishes. team
Scenario contexts at this level
- Two stakeholders each insist their feature is the top priority for the sprint.
- A product manager wants a small feature added mid-sprint that the lead engineer says will disrupt the goal.
- The team has ten things in progress and nothing has shipped in three weeks.
DE-2Estimation, planning, and honest commitments
3 questionsProficiency indicators
- I1A certified Associate can distinguish an estimate from a commitment, and buffer the commitment deliberately rather than promising the estimate. team
- I2A certified Associate can re-plan openly when a commitment is at risk, giving stakeholders the choice between scope, date and quality rather than absorbing the gap with overtime. team
- I3A certified Associate can decline to give a date on the spot without an estimate, and say what it would take to give one. team
Scenario contexts at this level
- The team is three weeks into a six-week commitment and the estimate has doubled.
- An executive asks for a delivery date in a meeting before any estimation has happened.
DE-3Reliability, incident response, and operational ownership
2 questionsProficiency indicators
- I1A certified Associate can run an incident in progress in the right order — restore service, communicate, then find the cause — and resist debugging while users are down. team
- I2A certified Associate can lead a blameless postmortem that changes the system rather than naming the person. team
- I3A certified Associate can treat on-call load and service-level objectives as the team's operational ownership, not an interruption to real work. team
Scenario contexts at this level
- A production incident is in progress and the engineer who caused it wants to find the root cause first.
- A release introduced a regression and the postmortem is drifting toward blame.
DE-4Managing scope, risk, and dependencies across workstreams
2 questionsProficiency indicators
- I1A certified Associate can name a risk early, with its likelihood and impact, rather than hoping it does not materialise. team
- I2A certified Associate can manage a dependency on another team by negotiating a timeline and a fallback, before escalating and before building around it. team
- I3A certified Associate can trade scope before quality when a deadline is fixed, and say so. team
Scenario contexts at this level
- The team's roadmap is blocked on a platform team's request that has waited four weeks.
- A fixed launch date is approaching and the only ways to hit it are to cut scope or cut testing.
DE-5Designing how work flows
2 questionsProficiency indicators
- I1A certified Associate can choose the lightest process that solves the team's actual problem, and change it when the problem changes. team
- I2A certified Associate can recognise when a drop in throughput is caused by interruptions and fragmentation rather than effort, and change the flow of work rather than push the people. team
- I3A certified Associate can introduce AI-assisted tooling to a team's workflow with an explicit view of what it changes about review, testing and ownership. team
Scenario contexts at this level
- Velocity has dropped for three sprints; engineers say they are busy but nothing ships.
- The team adopts a coding assistant and pull requests get larger and faster than review can handle.
Domain hub: Delivery & Execution
Strategy & Vision — 12 questions
SV-1Engineering strategy
3 questionsProficiency indicators
- I1A certified Associate can translate a business goal into the team's work as outcomes — the change wanted in the world — rather than a feature list. team
- I2A certified Associate can ensure every engineer can say why their current work matters to the business. team
- I3A certified Associate can re-derive the team's plan when circumstances change, instead of defending the original list. team
Scenario contexts at this level
- The organisation has adopted OKRs and an engineer cannot connect their tickets to any key result.
- A strategy arrives as a list of features with no theory of why they matter.
SV-2Communicating and partnering across functions
3 questionsProficiency indicators
- I1A certified Associate can explain a technical trade-off to a non-engineering stakeholder in the language of their outcome, without jargon and without condescension. team
- I2A certified Associate can partner with product and design as peers whose constraints are real, rather than as a queue of requests. team
- I3A certified Associate can deliver bad news about a delivery to a stakeholder early, with options, rather than late with excuses. team
Scenario contexts at this level
- A stakeholder presses for a date and does not understand why the estimate has a range.
- A product manager and the lead engineer disagree about a feature's size in front of the team.
SV-3Roadmapping
2 questionsProficiency indicators
- I1A certified Associate can hold a defined share of a team's capacity for platform and quality work and defend it with evidence of what its absence costs. team
- I2A certified Associate can present a team roadmap as bets with expected outcomes and confidence, not as a list of promised dates. team
- I3A certified Associate can recognise when a roadmap is a wish list assembled bottom-up with no connecting thesis. team
Scenario contexts at this level
- Product wants no reduction in feature output this quarter and the team's technical debt is slowing delivery.
- The team's roadmap is due and it is a list of everything anyone asked for.
SV-4Engineering economics
2 questionsProficiency indicators
- I1A certified Associate can frame a build-versus-buy decision around total cost, differentiation and reversibility rather than engineering preference. team
- I2A certified Associate can account for the cost of the team's delivery — people, vendors, infrastructure — well enough to argue for a change in it. team
- I3A certified Associate can evaluate an AI service or vendor as a third option beside build and buy, with its own cost and risk profile. team
Scenario contexts at this level
- An engineer proposes building an internal tool that a vendor sells.
- The team is asked to justify a new headcount request in business terms.
SV-5Engineering metrics and measurement
2 questionsProficiency indicators
- I1A certified Associate can choose delivery metrics that measure flow and stability rather than activity, and say what each one cannot show. team
- I2A certified Associate can recognise when a metric has become a target and is being gamed. team
- I3A certified Associate can decline to use a single productivity number for individuals, and explain why. team
Scenario contexts at this level
- Leadership wants a productivity score per engineer.
- A metric improved sharply in one sprint and nothing else changed.
SV-6Organisational design and leading change
not assessed at this levelSee What this exam does not assess below. Assessed from EMP-II.
Domain hub: Strategy & Vision
Technical Judgment — 12 questions
Proficiency indicators
- I1A certified Associate can improve a design decision through questions — what does this assume, what happens when it fails, who has to coordinate — without taking it over. team
- I2A certified Associate can spend deliberation on the irreversible decisions and let reversible ones move fast. team
- I3A certified Associate can see a system boundary and a team boundary as one decision. team
Scenario contexts at this level
- The team is choosing between a quick design and a sound one with a launch approaching.
- A proposed split of a service would require two teams to coordinate on every change.
TJ-2Technical debt
2 questionsProficiency indicators
- I1A certified Associate can make technical debt visible in terms stakeholders understand — what it costs per month, what it risks — rather than as an engineering complaint. team
- I2A certified Associate can distinguish debt worth repaying from debt worth carrying, and schedule repayment as ordinary work. team
- I3A certified Associate can recognise a proposed rewrite as a bet and evaluate it as one. team
Scenario contexts at this level
- Product wants no reduction in feature output and the team says the debt is unbearable.
- A senior engineer proposes rewriting a working system in a new framework.
TJ-3Code review and quality standards
3 questionsProficiency indicators
- I1A certified Associate can set a quality bar the team owns — tests, review, definition of done — and hold it under deadline pressure. team
- I2A certified Associate can shape a code-review culture that teaches rather than gatekeeps, and notice when review has become rubber-stamping. team
- I3A certified Associate can state what review must establish for AI-generated code, and who is accountable for it. team
Scenario contexts at this level
- A deadline is close and the team proposes skipping tests to make it.
- Coding assistants have made pull requests larger and review has become cursory.
- Two senior engineers block each other's pull requests over style.
TJ-4Technical credibility and intervention
2 questionsProficiency indicators
- I1A certified Associate can stay close enough to the team's technical work to judge it — reading designs, reviewing selectively, asking sharp questions — without becoming its bottleneck. team
- I2A certified Associate can decide when to intervene in a technical decision and when to let the team own it, and know which decisions are theirs. team
- I3A certified Associate can resist doing the engineering themselves when the team is struggling, and choose the intervention that leaves the team stronger. team
Scenario contexts at this level
- A newly promoted manager is still doing significant individual-contributor work and their team is not growing.
- The team is about to make a technical decision the manager believes is wrong.
TJ-5AI-assisted engineering
2 questionsProficiency indicators
- I1A certified Associate can introduce AI assistance to a team with explicit expectations for verification, ownership and disclosure. team
- I2A certified Associate can recognise the risks AI assistance introduces — unverified code, leaked data, eroded understanding — and put proportionate controls in place. team
- I3A certified Associate can distinguish where AI assistance genuinely helps the team from where it is being used to look fast. team
Scenario contexts at this level
- The chief executive asks whether engineering should adopt AI coding assistants everywhere.
- An engineer ships code generated by an assistant that they cannot explain in review.
Proficiency indicators
- I1A certified Associate can treat a security vulnerability, a privacy obligation or a compliance requirement as the team's own work, prioritised by risk rather than deferred to a function. team
- I2A certified Associate can respond to a security finding proportionately — triage by exploitability and exposure — rather than freezing or ignoring it. team
- I3A certified Associate can recognise a privacy or access-control problem in an everyday decision before it becomes an incident. team
Scenario contexts at this level
- A scanner reports hundreds of dependency vulnerabilities and the team is paralysed.
- An engineer has had unaudited write access to production data for months.
Domain hub: Technical Judgment
Culture & Coaching — 12 questions
CC-1Psychological safety and productive conflict
3 questionsProficiency indicators
- I1A certified Associate can respond to an admitted mistake, a naive question or a challenge to their idea with curiosity rather than punishment. team
- I2A certified Associate can pair psychological safety with high standards, and recognise that "going easy" is not safety. team
- I3A certified Associate can invite open disagreement about ideas and then expect commitment once the decision is made. team
Scenario contexts at this level
- Nobody on the team challenges anything in design reviews.
- Two senior engineers have a persistent tension that is affecting the team.
- An engineer admits to a costly mistake in a retrospective.
CC-2Coaching versus directing
3 questionsProficiency indicators
- I1A certified Associate can develop an engineer's judgment through questions rather than supplying the answer, and know when directing is the right exception. team
- I2A certified Associate can recognise when they are rescuing rather than coaching, and what the team learns from each. team
- I3A certified Associate can coach a senior engineer who is strong technically but does not mentor, document or lift others. team
Scenario contexts at this level
- An engineer brings every decision to the manager and the manager keeps deciding.
- A strong engineer is uninterested in helping anyone else grow.
CC-3Inclusive practices and equitable opportunity distribution
2 questionsProficiency indicators
- I1A certified Associate can notice who on the team gets the stretch work, the visibility and the benefit of the doubt, and correct the pattern. team
- I2A certified Associate can run team rituals — meetings, reviews, on-call, recognition — so that they do not systematically favour the loudest, the most present or the most similar to the manager. team
- I3A certified Associate can recognise glue work and ensure it is valued and distributed rather than left to whoever will not refuse it. team
Scenario contexts at this level
- Office-based engineers get spontaneous time with the manager; remote ones get scheduled calls, and promotions are following the pattern.
- One engineer does all the coordination work and none of the visible work.
CC-4Motivation, recognition, and sustainable pace
2 questionsProficiency indicators
- I1A certified Associate can recognise burnout and disengagement early from changes in behaviour, and respond to the person before the output. team
- I2A certified Associate can protect a sustainable pace, and treat a run of heroics as a system failure rather than a badge. team
- I3A certified Associate can recognise people specifically and in the way that person values, including on a distributed team where effort is not visible. team
Scenario contexts at this level
- A high performer has become withdrawn over two months.
- The team has been in crunch for a quarter and leadership calls it commitment.
CC-5Values, integrity, and ethical judgment under pressure
1 questionProficiency indicators
- I1A certified Associate can make the costly right call — on quality, on honesty, on a person — when pressure points the other way, and know that the team is watching. team
- I2A certified Associate can act on a values breach by a high performer rather than let results buy an exemption. team
- I3A certified Associate can recognise when they are being asked to shade the truth about status and decline. team
Scenario contexts at this level
- A manager is asked to report a slipping project as on track.
- The team's best engineer treats colleagues with contempt and delivers more than anyone.
CC-6Self-management
1 questionProficiency indicators
- I1A certified Associate can manage their own time and calendar so that the team's needs, not the inbox, determine where the hours go. team
- I2A certified Associate can recognise their own overload and burnout, set boundaries, and ask for help before it reaches the team. team
- I3A certified Associate can separate their own anxiety about a situation from the decision it needs. team
Scenario contexts at this level
- A new manager is working evenings to keep up with both coding and management and is visibly exhausted.
- A manager's calendar is entirely meetings and the team has not had a real one-on-one in a month.
Domain hub: Culture & Coaching
5. What this exam does not assess
- PL-6, Leading through leaders. An Associate leads engineers, not managers; there is no team-scope form of this competency. It carries no questions on EMA-I and its full weight from EMP-II.
- SV-6, Organisational design and leading change. Designing team structures and leading reorganisations is organisational-scope judgment. Questions may place an Associate inside a reorganisation, but they assess how the Associate leads their team through it (CC-4, CC-1), not the design of the change.
- Any competency at organisational or executive scope. EMA-I questions do not ask what a manager of managers or an executive should do; every scenario places the candidate as the leader of one team.
- Recall of models, frameworks, definitions or bibliography. No question asks the candidate to name a technique or define a term.
- Tools, languages, vendors or specific technologies. Questions are technology-neutral; any technical detail in a scenario is context, not the thing assessed.
- Employment law, human-resources policy or the practices of any specific company or jurisdiction.
6. Change log
- v3.0 · 2026-09-23. First published Exam Content Outline for EMA-I. Aligns the examination to the EMA Competency Framework v3.0 (twenty-nine competencies). Weights within each domain are stated for the first time; the examination's shape — 60 questions, 90 minutes, 70%, five domains at 20% each — is unchanged from the v1.0 framework.
Reading path
The Body of Knowledge units in the order this outline weights them — heaviest competency first within each domain — after the chapter that explains the scope tags. Generated from the outline; it is not a second opinion.
28 items · about 405 minutes in total · progress is saved in this browser only
- How Judgment Scalesread first · 12 min
- PL-1 Delegation, ownership, and decision rightsPeople Leadership · 3 questions · 15 min
- PL-2 Feedback and difficult conversationsPeople Leadership · 3 questions · 15 min
- PL-3 Hiring and onboardingPeople Leadership · 2 questions · 15 min
- PL-4 Performance managementPeople Leadership · 2 questions · 15 min
- PL-5 Career development and growth pathsPeople Leadership · 2 questions · 14 min
- DE-1 Prioritisation under constraintDelivery & Execution · 3 questions · 14 min
- DE-2 Estimation, planning, and honest commitmentsDelivery & Execution · 3 questions · 14 min
- DE-3 Reliability, incident response, and operational ownershipDelivery & Execution · 2 questions · 13 min
- DE-4 Managing scope, risk, and dependencies across workstreamsDelivery & Execution · 2 questions · 14 min
- DE-5 Designing how work flowsDelivery & Execution · 2 questions · 15 min
- SV-1 Engineering strategyStrategy & Vision · 3 questions · 14 min
- SV-2 Communicating and partnering across functionsStrategy & Vision · 3 questions · 14 min
- SV-3 RoadmappingStrategy & Vision · 2 questions · 13 min
- SV-4 Engineering economicsStrategy & Vision · 2 questions · 14 min
- SV-5 Engineering metrics and measurementStrategy & Vision · 2 questions · 13 min
- TJ-3 Code review and quality standardsTechnical Judgment · 3 questions · 15 min
- TJ-1 Evaluating architectural decisions and their organisational consequencesTechnical Judgment · 2 questions · 14 min
- TJ-2 Technical debtTechnical Judgment · 2 questions · 14 min
- TJ-4 Technical credibility and interventionTechnical Judgment · 2 questions · 16 min
- TJ-5 AI-assisted engineeringTechnical Judgment · 2 questions · 16 min
- TJ-6 Security, privacy, and compliance as engineering responsibilitiesTechnical Judgment · 1 question · 15 min
- CC-1 Psychological safety and productive conflictCulture & Coaching · 3 questions · 15 min
- CC-2 Coaching versus directingCulture & Coaching · 3 questions · 14 min
- CC-3 Inclusive practices and equitable opportunity distributionCulture & Coaching · 2 questions · 15 min
- CC-4 Motivation, recognition, and sustainable paceCulture & Coaching · 2 questions · 15 min
- CC-5 Values, integrity, and ethical judgment under pressureCulture & Coaching · 1 question · 16 min
- CC-6 Self-managementCulture & Coaching · 1 question · 16 min
Not on this path (not assessed at EMA-I): PL-6 Leading through leaders; SV-6 Organisational design and leading change.
Whole book: Body of Knowledge index.